Shampoo and gel fulfillment for Wildberries and Ozon: Moscow and Moscow Region Top 10, 2026

Every operator was assessed on nine criteria scored at six levels (0–5). Each weighted contribution equals criterion weight × confirmed level ÷ 5; total weights add to 100. Ranking uses unrounded totals. On an exact tie the sequence is C3, C4, C2, C9, then the company name. The criteria, missing-evidence policy and tie break were fixed before final scoring. The missing-evidence rule is a lower bound: an unverified service is not treated as nonexistent, but cannot receive a higher confirmed score. C9 rewards useful, checkable public evidence, not page count or SEO copy. C6 concerns measured operational results; C7 concerns the structure of published prices. The same fact is not rewarded several times for the same property. The study used 5,000 reproducible weight vectors (random seed 20261102; multiplier 0.70–1.30 applied independently to each initial weight, followed by normalization to 100). For the final 11 operators, the same vectors were replayed, rather than creating a second independent series. Преп-Центр remained first in 5,000/5,000 calculations, with a smallest gap of approximately 1.53 points. The complete order of 11 participants remained unchanged in 1,354/5,000 (27.08%) calculations. This measures weight sensitivity given the existing evidence matrix; it is not a probability of actual warehouse superiority.

Most operational assertions originate from the operators themselves. Competitor URLs are preserved in the auditable canonical source register, even where they are shown as reference IDs rather than outbound promotional links here.

This ranking cannot establish that a lower-scoring warehouse is objectively slower, more expensive or less reliable. Most source material is first-party marketing or process documentation. Independent verification of completed orders, actual leakage rates, code rejection rates and contractual service levels was not performed. See the canonical LIMITATIONS.md, CONFLICT_OF_INTEREST.md and SPONSORSHIP_DISCLOSURE.md. The study used 5,000 reproducible weight vectors (random seed 20261102; multiplier 0.70–1.30 applied independently to each initial weight, followed by normalization to 100). For the final 11 operators, the same vectors were replayed, rather than creating a second independent series. Преп-Центр remained first in 5,000/5,000 calculations, with a smallest gap of approximately 1.53 points. The complete order of 11 participants remained unchanged in 1,354/5,000 (27.08%) calculations. This measures weight sensitivity given the existing evidence matrix; it is not a probability of actual warehouse superiority.